In 2013 these particular funds were overwhelmingly used for just one purpose - expansion of railway station cycle parking facilities.
This sum breaks down as follows: However, this can also be looked at in a different way as different levels of government cross-subsidize each other.This is because all levels of government include cycling components in other projects. It should also be noted that cycling infrastructure which is part of new developments is paid for by the builders of those developments.Note the acknowledged to be "invisible" cycling costs.It doesn't matter what channels the money might be diverted through in either country. In the Netherlands the expenditure is at a very much higher level than in the UK and this money is also spent far more efficiently than in the UK. Norman Baker's comparison of total UK funds for cycling with the funds directly allocated by Dutch central government are interesting because they are so obviously a comparison of apples with oranges.The published Dutch figures which Norman Baker referred to are funds are for very specific uses.To catch up with The Netherlands other countries must spend more for a short time in order to progress quickly and then drop to the same rate as The Netherlands or spend the same amount and wait a long time (quality will then approach what The Netherlands has asymptotically, fast progress initially followed by a long period of catchup up). Britain, with it's population of around 65 million people, needs to spend the equivalent of about €2 billion per year to match Dutch expenditure.